Is the Bible infallible and inerrant or is it fallible and at times errant?
I recently read a piece arguing that the Bible was fallible just as Jesus in His humanity was fallible. That got a reaction out of me and very likely will get a reaction out of you.
So called "conservative" Christians and so called "progressive" Christians debate on a great many things and this is one of them. When it comes to the labels "Progressive" and "Conservative", whether it be in theology, morality, politics or whatever the word following the label may be, it is important to think about what is being conserved or toward what are we progressing. There are a great many things I want to progress toward and a great many things I am glad those before me progressed toward. There are a great many things I want to conserve and a great many things I am glad were conserved for me.
When it comes to the issue of Biblical inerrancy what is being conserved? When it comes to the notion of a fallible Bible what is one progressing toward?
Let me start by saying that some in the "conservative" wing of this debate can at times miss the ball. In the name of conservatism there are some, mostly not a thoughtful bunch, that would ignore that sentences are in paragraphs, paragraphs are in sections, sections are in books with a genre and a point trying to be made, and the book is in the cannon of Scripture. Some in this camp will say, "It says what it says" without bothering to actually discover what is being said. It may be uneducated or simply lazy reading.
That said, the conservative approach to this, the one that says that in the original language and manuscripts the Bible is without fault and is the very Words of God as penned by a human author inspired by the Holy Spirit, is worth conserving.
The question that sticks with me is this: Am I a student or a proof-reader when I come to my Bible?
When one reads the Bible are they over the Word or under the Word? Do I come to the Bible to seek and understand what it says and what it means or do I come to decide whether or not I think it to be right?
This is no new concept. Martin Luther in the Large Catechism said, "I and my neighbor and, in short, all people may err or deceive. But God's Word cannot err." This is no new concept. 500 years ago Luther and all the reformers stood on this as fact and it has been conserved to this day.
If we leave Biblical inerrancy and infallibility toward what are we progressing?
Well, if all come to the Bible to decide what in it we find to be true and what in it we find to be false then we come to the Bible as a god and not a disciple (which means learner). If we come to our Bible in this way then we get what the book of Judges (21:25b) said caused great darkness, "Everyone did what was right in his own eyes."
But you say that this is an overreaction. Everyone won't do what is right in their own eyes. And here lies much of the issue: You would have everyone do what it right in your eyes. You would be a god or at least have your tribe be the gods.
I encourage you to think this through. I encourage you to take the Bible for what it is and what it claims to be (2 Timothy 3:16): inerrant and infallible. Resist the urge to eat the forbidden fruit and claim to be like God knowing good from evil and instead to take the bread mentioned in Deuteronomy 8:3 and Matthew 4:4 and be sustained by it and to put yourself under it today.